Global Uncertainty and Crisis Communication: Questions Boards May Want to Consider
When global events create uncertainty, leadership teams may face immediate communication questions. Should the company respond publicly? What should employees hear first? And when, if at all, should the board become involved?
Geopolitical developments, economic disruption, or regional instability can affect companies in ways that are not always immediately visible. Supply chains, employees, customers, and partners may all feel the impact. As situations evolve, leadership teams may face pressure to communicate quickly with stakeholders.
For boards of private companies, these moments raise an important governance question: what role should directors play in crisis communication?
Directors are not responsible for managing day-to-day communications during a crisis. That responsibility rests with management. However, governance guidance consistently emphasizes that boards play an important oversight role when events have the potential to affect strategy, operations, or reputation.
In situations like these, directors may find it helpful to step back and consider a few key questions.
Has management assessed whether the situation materially affects the company’s operations, workforce, or key business relationships? Not every global development requires a public response, but leadership should understand potential impacts on the organization.
Does the company have a clear crisis communication framework in place? Many organizations establish protocols that define decision-making authority, identify a spokesperson, and ensure internal and external communications remain aligned.
How is leadership communicating with employees? During periods of uncertainty, employees often look to company leadership for clarity about how developments may affect the business and the workforce.
Finally, is there a shared understanding between the board and management about when the board should become involved if a situation escalates?
Periods of global uncertainty can evolve quickly. Maintaining clear governance boundaries while ensuring the organization is prepared to communicate effectively can help companies navigate sensitive moments with greater confidence.
Governance organizations including PwC, EY, and the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance frequently highlight crisis preparedness and communication oversight as important responsibilities for boards.
Conversations around crisis preparedness, risk oversight, and leadership communication continue to be part of the dialogue within the PDA community.
Related Resources:
Article: Crisis Management: Four Ways Your Board Can Add Value
Article: Navigating Strategic Risks
On-Demand Educational Videos: