DEI in Private Company Governance: A Business Imperative or a Political Risk? 

In today's corporate landscape, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) remains a complex and evolving topic for private company Boards. While research suggests that DEI enhances decision-making, innovation and financial performance, it also faces mounting critiques and implementation barriers, particularly as political and legal challenges reshape the conversation. 

To explore these tensions, we spoke with Dr. Anita Polite-Wilson, Southern California Chapter member, Board Director and Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging Consultant, who advises executive leaders and Boards on implementing DEI into governance. Dr. Polite-Wilson provides a candid look at DEI’s business case, the challenges companies face and what Boards should be asking themselves as they navigate this shifting landscape. 

The Business Case for DEI in Governance 

Companies that prioritize DEI initiatives see up to 35% more revenue than those that don’t, according to multiple studies. Dr. Polite-Wilson emphasizes that this isn’t just about ethicsit’s about financial sense. 

"If we don’t understand the different backgrounds and walks of life that we’re marketing to, we’re leaving a lot of money on the table," she explains. Ironically, she points out, many companies readily embrace diversity in investment portfolios while struggling to apply the same principle to their workforce and leadership. 

Beyond financial returns, DEI strengthens corporate governance by enhancing risk management and resilience. A diverse Board can anticipate blind spots, improve problem-solving and prevent reputational missteps. Dr. Polite-Wilson cites Dove, which faced significant public backlash over a controversial ad campaign—one that could have been avoided with a more inclusive decision-making process. 

"Had there been someone in the room to say, ‘This isn’t a good idea,’ they would have saved themselves millions in production costs and a major public relations crisis," she notes.  

The Challenges and Critiques of DEI Initiatives 

Despite the advantages, DEI efforts often encounter skepticism. Dr. Polite-Wilson acknowledges a common critique that many initiatives fail because they are performative rather than transformative. 

"Most DEI programs don’t work because the approach doesn’t work," she explains. "You can’t go around calling people out. Instead, you need to call people into the knowledge of the impacts their decisions have on others." 

Another significant challenge is the shifting political and legal landscape. Several companies and corporations have scaled back their DEI commitments due to state-level regulations and legal challenges. Companies like Apple, Meta and Target have been caught between political pressures and stakeholder expectations, forcing them to reconsider their approaches. 

Boards as DEI Leaders: The Role of Governance 

Board members play a critical role in shaping a company’s culture, not just by setting policies, but by modeling behavior. Dr. Polite-Wilson stresses that Board leaders must challenge norms and hold leadership accountable for meaningful inclusion efforts. 

She recalls an instance where she pointed out the impact of an executive’s language during a Board meeting, urging them to reconsider referring to staff as "lower-level managers." 

"Language matters," she told them. "What if you replaced 'lower-level' with 'frontline management'— a term that reflects their critical role in handling real-time challenges? That simple shift changes how people perceive their value within the organization."  

Navigating the Future: What Boards Should Be Asking 

With some organizations backtracking on DEI due to external pressures, Boards must determine whether they will lead, follow or retreat. Rather than framing DEI as a compliance obligation, Dr. Polite-Wilson suggests Boards ask: 

  1. Why or why not? – If DEI initiatives have been deprioritized, is it due to genuine strategic concerns or external pressures? If the company values diversity in other areas, why is workforce diversity treated differently? 

  1. Who is at the table? – Does Board composition reflect the evolving workforce and customer base? Are leadership pipelines inclusive of diverse, qualified candidates? 

  1. How is DEI operationalized? – Are DEI principles merely aspirational, or are they integrated into hiring, leadership development and decision-making? Is the company fishing from the same recruitment pools, or expanding outreach to underrepresented talent? 

Dr. Polite-Wilson urges companies to rethink their approach, even if the terminology changes. 

"We may need to retire the term ‘DEI’ but rewire the work," she explains. "The companies that stay committed, even through political headwinds, will build stronger cultures and more resilient businesses in the long run." 

Final Thought 

As private company Boards navigate an increasingly complex environment, the real question is not whether DEI is "worth it," but whether companies can afford to ignore it. With shifting demographics, evolving customer expectations and changing workforce priorities, the companies that ask the right questions today will be the ones thriving tomorrow. 

 


 Let us know how your Board or company is approaching this topic on CommUnity